Management high performance Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Management high performance - try ExampleIn autocratic lead, the attractions possess total authority over their team (Rao, 2010). different members of the team are incapacitated to air their views, even when such opinions may benefit the organizations. Most employees degrade this leadership form. As such, it leads to low work force turnover. However, it may be suitable in situations requiring right away decision-making processes. Autocratic leaders tend to be more than formal than informal and more centralized.Democratic/participative leadership model incorporates opposite team members in their decision-making process thought the final decision-making process is mandated to the leader (Rao, 2010). This capacitates the employees to tally time-to-time suggestions to their leaders for various improvements. Such leaders tend to be more informal than formal and more decentralized.In the article, Is Autocratic Leadership Relevant at present? Rao critically examines Autocratic lea dership over other leadership forms and its suitability in todays environment (Rao, 2010). Rao argues that though this form of leadership is hard-nosed in fields such as the military, it may be impractical to incorporate it in todays business environment, where employees call for incorporation in various decision-making processes and act as core partners, since they drama a key role in the goal achievement of an organization. Additionally, Rao argues that in case a trusty experiences challenges, the leader takes the sole responsibility. Rao also perceives Autocratic leadership to be marred with dissatisfied customers, and the recurrence of absenteeism in spite of appearance an organization (Walker, 2011).Autocratic leadership also creates a weak workforce, owing to the continued fear of the leaders directives. Wrong decisions may lead to unprecedented losses, since employees only follow such directives without questioning (Daft, 2014).Chois article attempts to put forward the key differences of